 |
| Corporate professionals analyzing IBC resolutions, asset valuations, and recovery strategies under the 2025 reforms. |
Understanding the IBC Resolution Process: Challenges, Reforms, and the Path Forward
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Overview of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC)
- Current Economic Issues in Corporate Insolvency
- Delays in Resolution
- Haircuts and Asset Valuation
- Limited Pool of Resolution Applicants
- Recent Parliamentary Panel Observations on the IBC
- Simplifying Complex Issues: Enterprise Value vs Liquidation Value
- Data-Driven Insights on IBC Recovery Rates
- The Case for Cross-Border Insolvency
- Proposed Reforms in the IBC Amendment Bill 2025
- Global Best Practices in Insolvency Resolution
- FAQs About the IBC Resolution Process
- Conclusion
- References
1. Introduction
India’s corporate insolvency landscape has undergone a transformation since the introduction of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) in 2016. The law was designed to strengthen creditor confidence, expedite resolution, and encourage investments. However, as highlighted by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance, challenges such as haircuts, asset valuation issues, and inadequate judicial infrastructure continue to limit its effectiveness.
This blog delves deep into the IBC resolution process, recent critiques, ongoing economic implications, and potential reforms. Through data, examples, and a simplified analytical lens, we aim to make complex insolvency issues accessible for both professionals and the general reader.
2. Overview of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC)
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016 marked a revolutionary shift in India’s financial and legal landscape by consolidating fragmented insolvency laws into a single, coherent framework. Prior to the IBC, companies facing financial distress navigated a maze of outdated regulations, often resulting in prolonged delays and suboptimal recovery for creditors. The IBC was designed to streamline the insolvency process, promote accountability, and foster a market-driven approach to business restructuring.
Objectives of the IBC
The IBC was enacted with clear objectives aimed at improving the health of India’s financial ecosystem. The first objective is to ensure the timely resolution of distressed companies. Delays in resolving insolvency not only reduce the value of the assets but also create uncertainty in the market. By introducing strict timelines and structured processes, the IBC seeks to address these challenges effectively.
Secondly, the IBC focuses on maximizing asset value for creditors. Under previous frameworks, prolonged legal battles and inefficient recovery mechanisms often resulted in creditors receiving only a fraction of what they were owed. By establishing clear procedures and prioritizing creditor interests, the IBC helps ensure that recoveries are optimized, benefiting both lenders and the overall economy.
Lastly, the IBC encourages a market-driven approach for restructuring businesses. Instead of relying solely on court-mandated solutions, the code allows creditors and stakeholders to explore commercially viable options, fostering a competitive environment for restructuring distressed firms.
Key Features of the IBC
The IBC introduces several critical features that distinguish it from previous insolvency laws and make it more effective in handling financial distress.
Resolution Timeframe
One of the most significant features of the IBC is the defined resolution timeframe. The code stipulates that insolvency resolution should ideally be completed within 330 days from the date of admission. This timeline ensures that companies do not languish in uncertainty for years, preserving both business value and employment opportunities.
Committee of Creditors (CoC)
The Committee of Creditors (CoC) plays a pivotal role in the IBC framework. Comprised primarily of financial creditors, the CoC is responsible for making key decisions regarding the resolution plan of a distressed company. This structure ensures that those who are most financially impacted have a decisive say in the recovery process, promoting transparency and efficiency.
Resolution Professionals (RPs)
Resolution Professionals (RPs) act as neutral overseers, similar to bankruptcy trustees in other countries. Appointed to manage the resolution process, RPs evaluate claims, coordinate with creditors, and facilitate the development of viable resolution plans. Their role is crucial in maintaining fairness and accountability throughout the insolvency process.
Haircuts
The concept of haircuts is another notable feature of the IBC. Haircuts represent the difference between the claims owed to creditors and the actual amount they recover after the resolution process. While they may seem like a loss for creditors, haircuts are often necessary to ensure a workable resolution plan that allows the distressed company to survive or enables a structured liquidation with maximum recovery.
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016 has transformed India’s approach to financial distress by consolidating multiple laws into a unified, efficient framework. Its focus on timely resolution, asset maximization, and a market-driven restructuring process has strengthened creditor confidence and improved the ease of doing business in India. By incorporating structured timelines, the Committee of Creditors, Resolution Professionals, and the concept of haircuts, the IBC ensures that both corporate survival and creditor interests are balanced effectively.
In a rapidly evolving economy, the IBC continues to serve as a critical tool for maintaining financial stability, promoting transparency, and enabling a robust market for corporate restructuring.
3. Current Economic Issues in Corporate Insolvency
Corporate insolvency is a critical aspect of modern economies, providing a legal mechanism to resolve debt defaults while attempting to maximize recovery for creditors. In India, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) has been hailed as a transformative reform aimed at streamlining insolvency proceedings and reviving stressed businesses. However, despite its intentions, several economic challenges continue to affect the effectiveness of the IBC. These issues not only impact creditors and investors but also shape the overall business environment.
Delays in Resolution
One of the most pressing issues in corporate insolvency is the persistent delay in resolution processes. While the IBC mandates strict timelines for completing insolvency proceedings, practical challenges often derail timely resolution. Several factors contribute to these delays:
- Inadequate judicial infrastructure: The growing number of cases often overwhelms insolvency courts, leading to prolonged litigation. The shortage of specialized benches and experienced adjudicators further compounds the problem.
- Frequent judicial reversals of resolution plans: Courts sometimes overturn approved resolution plans due to procedural or compliance issues. Such reversals not only reset the timeline but also undermine confidence in the insolvency framework.
- Slow post-resolution processes: Even after a resolution plan is approved, executing it can be slow, affecting fund disbursal to creditors and the revival of the company.
These delays have real economic consequences. Creditors face prolonged uncertainty, and companies that could have been revived lose operational momentum. In many cases, the delays reduce the value of assets, making eventual recovery lower than anticipated. Streamlining judicial processes and strengthening infrastructure are therefore critical to improving insolvency outcomes in India.
Haircuts and Asset Valuation
Another significant concern in corporate insolvency is the issue of haircuts. A haircut represents the gap between the amount lenders expect to recover and the actual amount received during insolvency proceedings. According to a report by the Parliamentary Committee, several factors contribute to substantial haircuts:
- Assets often valued at liquidation value rather than enterprise value: Liquidation value is typically lower because it assumes a forced sale, whereas enterprise value considers the company as a going concern.
- Limited competition in bidding: The scarcity of resolution applicants often results in distress sales at discounted prices.
- Average recovery under the IBC is only 32.8% of total claims: This statistic highlights that lenders frequently recover less than one-third of what they are owed, emphasizing the economic inefficiency of the current system.
Example: Suppose a company owes ₹1,000 crore to its creditors. If the company is liquidated at a valuation based on liquidation value, lenders may recover only ₹328 crore. This results in a massive haircut of ₹672 crore, representing not only a financial loss but also a loss of trust in the insolvency system. Such outcomes discourage lending and can tighten credit availability, especially for businesses already operating in high-risk sectors.
Addressing haircuts requires better valuation methods and encouraging bids based on enterprise value rather than liquidation value. Additionally, creating a competitive bidding environment with global participation can enhance recovery rates and reduce haircuts.
Limited Pool of Resolution Applicants
A third economic challenge in corporate insolvency is the limited pool of resolution applicants. The effectiveness of the IBC relies heavily on having multiple qualified applicants who can submit credible resolution plans. However, several factors constrain the pool of bidders:
- Few qualified resolution applicants: The eligibility criteria, while necessary to ensure credible bids, often exclude potentially capable investors, particularly smaller firms or new entrants.
- Lack of global outreach: Indian distressed assets rarely attract foreign investors, limiting competition and reducing potential asset value realization.
- Smaller recovery pools discourage foreign investment: When average recoveries are low due to haircuts or valuation issues, international investors may perceive Indian insolvency as risky, reducing the influx of capital.
The limited pool of applicants has far-reaching economic implications. Low competition often leads to undervaluation of assets and diminished creditor returns. Moreover, it hampers the ability of the IBC to function as an effective tool for corporate revival, as the companies that need restructuring may fail to attract viable bids. Expanding outreach to global investors, relaxing certain eligibility conditions, and promoting transparency in bidding processes can help broaden the applicant pool and improve outcomes.
The current economic challenges in corporate insolvency—delays in resolution, significant haircuts, and a limited pool of resolution applicants—highlight the need for systemic reforms in India. While the IBC has laid a strong foundation for restructuring stressed companies, addressing these issues is critical for maximizing recovery, encouraging investment, and reviving viable businesses.
Improving judicial infrastructure, adopting enterprise-value-based asset valuations, and expanding the pool of resolution applicants are essential steps toward making insolvency proceedings more efficient and economically beneficial. For India to fully realize the potential of its corporate insolvency framework, policymakers, regulators, and market participants must work together to overcome these structural challenges.
Optimizing the corporate insolvency process is not just a matter of legal compliance—it directly impacts economic growth, investor confidence, and the long-term health of India’s business ecosystem.
4. Recent Parliamentary Panel Observations on the IBC
The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance recently reviewed the IBC Amendment Bill, 2025, highlighting critical areas where the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) can be strengthened. The committee’s observations focus on improving efficiency, transparency, and recovery outcomes in corporate insolvency cases, signaling the government’s intent to refine the framework for both domestic and cross-border investors.
Haircuts and Asset Valuation
One of the key concerns raised by the committee is the issue of haircuts—the gap between creditors’ expected recovery and actual amounts received. Currently, assets are often valued at liquidation value, which underestimates their worth. The committee recommended adopting enterprise-level price discovery to ensure that assets are valued as going concerns. This approach could significantly reduce haircuts, increase creditor confidence, and improve overall recovery rates.
Judicial Delays
The committee also noted persistent judicial delays in insolvency resolution. Frequent reversals of approved resolution plans contribute to uncertainty and slow down the revival of stressed companies. Such delays not only affect creditors but also deter potential investors. Streamlining judicial procedures and providing specialized benches for insolvency cases were suggested as ways to address these challenges.
Accountability of Resolution Professionals
Resolution professionals (RPs) play a central role in executing resolution plans, yet the committee emphasized the need for clear standard operating procedures (SOPs) to enhance transparency and accountability. By standardizing processes and defining responsibilities more explicitly, stakeholders can ensure smoother execution of plans and minimize disputes.
Cross-Border Insolvency and Global Bidding
With globalization, many Indian companies have assets across multiple jurisdictions. The committee stressed the importance of cross-border insolvency frameworks to efficiently manage such cases. Additionally, encouraging global bidding can increase competition among resolution applicants, helping to maximize asset value and reduce recovery losses. Greater international participation would also signal India’s commitment to a transparent and investor-friendly insolvency environment.
The Parliamentary Standing Committee’s observations highlight the need for systemic reforms in the IBC. Addressing haircuts, judicial delays, accountability, and cross-border insolvency can significantly improve creditor recovery and strengthen investor confidence. By implementing these recommendations, India can further enhance the efficiency, transparency, and global competitiveness of its corporate insolvency framework.
5. Simplifying Complex Issues: Enterprise Value vs Liquidation Value
Many readers struggle to differentiate liquidation value and enterprise value:
| Aspect | Liquidation Value | Enterprise Value |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Asset worth if sold quickly | Value of company as a going concern |
| Recovery Potential | Lower, distress-driven | Higher, reflects long-term earnings |
| Risk | High, forced sale | Lower, market-driven |
Analogy:
Think of a classic car. Sold at auction quickly → low price (liquidation). Sold via a collector’s market → higher price (enterprise value). Similarly, IBC recovery using enterprise value can maximize creditor returns.
6. Data-Driven Insights on IBC Recovery Rates
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) has been a cornerstone in India’s efforts to streamline corporate debt resolution. By providing a structured framework for insolvency proceedings, the IBC aims to maximize creditor recoveries while enabling viable companies to be revived. However, a closer look at the data on recovery rates reveals both the progress and the persistent challenges in the system.
Recovery Statistics as of March 31, 2025
According to the latest figures:
- Total Companies Resolved: 1,194
- Creditors’ Realization: ₹3.89 lakh crore
- Total Admitted Claims: ₹11 lakh crore
- Recovery Rate: 32.8% of claims, equivalent to 170.1% of liquidation value
These numbers provide a clear snapshot of how the IBC has performed over the years. Resolving nearly 1,200 companies shows the system’s ability to handle complex insolvency cases efficiently. Creditors collectively recovered ₹3.89 lakh crore, which is significant progress considering the historical challenges associated with non-performing assets in India.
Understanding the Recovery Rate
The recovery rate of 32.8% indicates that, on average, creditors receive about one-third of the total claims filed. Interestingly, this recovery also represents 170.1% of the liquidation value, suggesting that resolution through the IBC often yields higher returns than outright liquidation. This reinforces the IBC’s goal of preserving business value wherever possible, instead of forcing immediate asset sales at distressed prices.
However, the same data underscores a critical limitation: the majority of creditor claims remain unrecovered. Low recovery rates often arise from undervaluation of assets, limited competition among resolution applicants, and delays in completing the resolution process. These factors can reduce creditor confidence and potentially discourage future lending, especially for businesses with higher perceived risk.
Implications and the Path Forward
Data-driven insights highlight the need for valuation reforms and more competitive bidding mechanisms. By focusing on enterprise-value-based asset valuations rather than liquidation values, stakeholders can increase recoveries and reduce haircuts. Similarly, widening the pool of qualified resolution applicants—both domestic and global—can drive more competitive bids, ensuring creditors recover a higher proportion of their claims.
In conclusion, while the IBC has made remarkable strides in corporate insolvency resolution, the recovery data emphasizes areas that require attention. Enhancing valuation practices and promoting competitive resolution processes will be key to strengthening creditor confidence and realizing the full potential of India’s insolvency framework.
7.The Case for Cross-Border Insolvency
In today’s interconnected global economy, businesses increasingly operate across multiple countries, making cross-border insolvency a growing concern. Companies with international assets or creditors face unique challenges when dealing with insolvency in India, as current laws are primarily designed for domestic cases. Without a structured framework, resolving claims that span jurisdictions becomes complicated, time-consuming, and often financially detrimental.
Challenges in India
One of the main hurdles in handling cross-border insolvency in India is the lack of a structured framework. While the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) provides mechanisms for domestic insolvency, it does not adequately address scenarios involving assets, creditors, or operations abroad. This gap can create conflicts between Indian courts and foreign jurisdictions, complicating the resolution process.
Delays in asset recovery are another significant issue. When a company has assets in multiple countries, it may take months or even years to secure legal approvals and transfer funds, resulting in prolonged uncertainty for creditors. These delays can reduce the overall value recovered, especially in high-value insolvency cases where foreign assets constitute a major portion of total claims.
Additionally, companies and creditors face losses in high-value cases due to jurisdictional gaps. Assets held overseas may remain inaccessible, and without coordinated legal mechanisms, creditors often recover only a fraction of their claims. This lack of efficiency not only undermines creditor confidence but also discourages foreign investment in India.
Proposed Solutions
Recognizing these challenges, the IBC Amendment Bill, 2025 proposes introducing cross-border insolvency provisions. These mechanisms aim to align India’s insolvency framework with global standards, providing clarity on how foreign claims and assets should be treated. By establishing legal reciprocity with other jurisdictions, India can facilitate smoother resolution of international claims, reduce delays, and maximize recoveries.
Example: Consider a conglomerate with operations in the UAE and Singapore. Without cross-border insolvency provisions, unresolved claims in these countries may stall the overall resolution process in India, causing financial losses for creditors. With structured cross-border mechanisms, Indian authorities can coordinate with foreign courts, allowing faster settlement and efficient asset recovery.
Incorporating cross-border insolvency provisions is no longer optional—it is essential for India’s growing global business environment. By modernizing the IBC to address international claims, India can improve recovery rates, attract foreign investment, and strengthen its position as a credible destination for global businesses. Cross-border insolvency reforms promise a more robust, efficient, and investor-friendly framework that meets the realities of a globalized economy.
8. Proposed Reforms in the IBC Amendment Bill 2025
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) has been a cornerstone of India’s corporate insolvency framework, providing a structured mechanism to resolve stressed assets and protect creditor interests. However, ongoing economic challenges—such as delays in resolution, limited recovery rates, and restricted competition—have highlighted the need for reforms. The IBC Amendment Bill 2025, guided by recommendations from the Parliamentary Committee, seeks to address these challenges through a comprehensive set of measures aimed at improving transparency, accountability, and recovery outcomes.
Enterprise-Level Valuation
One of the key reforms proposed is the adoption of enterprise-level valuation for distressed companies. Currently, assets are often assessed at their liquidation value, which assumes a forced sale and typically underestimates the company’s true potential. Enterprise-level valuation, in contrast, considers the business as a going concern, factoring in future cash flows, operational strengths, and market opportunities.
This change can have a transformative impact on recovery rates. By reflecting the true potential of distressed companies, creditors are more likely to recover higher amounts, and viable businesses have a better chance of revival. For example, a company previously expected to recover only ₹328 crore under liquidation valuation could see recovery rise significantly when enterprise valuation is applied, reducing haircuts and improving creditor confidence.
Global Outreach for Competitive Bidding
The amendment also emphasizes global outreach to attract a wider pool of resolution applicants. Limited competition has historically resulted in distress sales and low recovery rates. By inviting foreign investors and international firms to participate in bidding, the IBC aims to increase competition and drive better valuations.
Global participation not only enhances recovery for creditors but also strengthens India’s position as an attractive destination for investment in distressed assets. Greater competition ensures that bids reflect fair market value, minimizing losses and boosting the overall effectiveness of the insolvency framework.
Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)
To streamline the resolution process, the bill proposes clear Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for liquidators and valuers. Currently, procedural ambiguities can delay asset resolution and lead to disputes. SOPs will define specific responsibilities, timelines, and reporting standards, ensuring that all stakeholders follow consistent practices.
These measures aim to reduce procedural errors, improve efficiency, and restore confidence among creditors and investors. SOPs also provide a framework for accountability, making it easier to track actions and decisions throughout the insolvency process.
Post-Resolution Support
Another critical area addressed by the bill is post-resolution support. After a resolution plan is approved, companies often face delays in obtaining “no dues” certificates and completing regulatory compliance. The amendment proposes a transparent online mechanism to manage these post-resolution formalities efficiently.
This initiative ensures that companies can resume operations smoothly, creditors receive timely payments, and overall delays in post-resolution processes are minimized. A digital system enhances transparency, reduces administrative bottlenecks, and provides an audit trail of completed tasks.
Accountability Measures
Finally, the IBC Amendment Bill 2025 emphasizes accountability measures for resolution professionals. The bill mandates robust audit trails for all decisions made by insolvency professionals, including valuations, asset sales, and creditor communications.
By introducing stronger accountability standards, the reforms aim to deter malpractice, improve governance, and enhance stakeholder trust. Creditors, investors, and regulators can monitor actions taken during the resolution process, ensuring that decisions are transparent and justifiable.
The proposed reforms in the IBC Amendment Bill 2025 address critical weaknesses in the existing insolvency framework. By adopting enterprise-level valuations, promoting global bidding, introducing SOPs, ensuring post-resolution support, and strengthening accountability, the amendments aim to enhance transparency, maximize recovery rates, and facilitate the revival of distressed companies.
If implemented effectively, these reforms can significantly improve the efficiency of corporate insolvency proceedings in India, attract both domestic and international investors, and reinforce the credibility of the IBC as a tool for corporate revival. In a rapidly evolving economic landscape, these measures are crucial to creating a more resilient and transparent insolvency ecosystem.
9. Global Best Practices in Insolvency Resolution
Corporate insolvency is a critical mechanism for economic stability, ensuring that distressed companies are either revived or efficiently wound up to protect creditors’ interests. While India has made significant strides with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), looking at global best practices can provide valuable lessons to enhance efficiency, maximize recovery, and attract investment. Countries like the United States, the United Kingdom, and Singapore have developed innovative insolvency frameworks that prioritize restructuring, speed, and cross-border coordination.
United States: Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
The United States offers a robust model through Chapter 11 bankruptcy, which emphasizes restructuring over liquidation. Under Chapter 11:
- Companies can continue operations while formulating a plan to repay creditors.
- Management remains in control under court supervision, ensuring business continuity.
- The framework encourages negotiations between creditors and debtors to reach mutually acceptable solutions.
This approach allows companies to retain value as going concerns rather than being forced into distress sales. For instance, many high-profile U.S. firms have successfully used Chapter 11 to restructure massive debts while safeguarding jobs and maintaining market presence. For India, adopting a similar restructuring-focused approach could reduce unnecessary liquidations under the IBC and improve creditor recoveries.
United Kingdom: Pre-Pack Administrations
The United Kingdom provides another innovative example with pre-pack administrations. In this process:
- A sale of the company’s business or assets is arranged before the appointment of administrators.
- Transactions are executed immediately after administration begins, minimizing delays.
- The goal is to preserve value and maintain business operations, reducing disruption for employees and creditors.
Pre-pack administrations help maximize recovery by avoiding prolonged insolvency proceedings that often erode asset value. For India, integrating elements of pre-pack strategies could shorten resolution timelines, prevent asset depreciation, and make the IBC more attractive to both domestic and international investors.
Singapore: Cross-Border Insolvency Frameworks
Singapore has emerged as a global hub for insolvency due to its emphasis on cross-border frameworks. With businesses increasingly operating internationally, Singapore’s laws:
- Enable efficient coordination between domestic and foreign courts.
- Protect creditors’ claims while allowing global restructuring of assets.
- Expedite recovery by reducing jurisdictional conflicts and procedural delays.
India, with its growing foreign investment and multinational corporate presence, could benefit from adopting cross-border insolvency principles. This would ensure faster asset recovery, encourage global investors to participate in resolution processes, and increase confidence in the Indian insolvency framework.
Takeaway for India
Examining these international practices highlights several lessons for India:
- Restructuring over liquidation: Like the U.S., India could enhance the IBC’s focus on reviving companies rather than forcing liquidation, improving overall recovery rates.
- Speedy resolution mechanisms: Adopting pre-pack-style strategies, similar to the U.K., could reduce delays and preserve asset value.
- Global coordination: Cross-border frameworks, as in Singapore, can make India’s insolvency system more investor-friendly and efficient.
By integrating these best practices, India can make the IBC not only more efficient but also globally competitive. Faster resolutions, better recoveries, and streamlined processes will attract both domestic and international investment, strengthening the corporate ecosystem.
Global insolvency systems demonstrate that speed, restructuring, and cross-border coordination are key to effective corporate resolution. The U.S., U.K., and Singapore provide practical models that can be adapted to the Indian context, helping the IBC evolve into a world-class framework. By learning from these examples, India can enhance creditor confidence, support business revival, and create a more resilient economic environment.
10. FAQs About the IBC Resolution Process
Q1: What is a haircut in IBC?
A: The difference between the creditor’s claim and the actual recovery during resolution.
Q2: Why is asset valuation important?
A: Accurate valuation ensures creditors receive fair returns and prevents distress sales.
Q3: How can cross-border insolvency benefit India?
A: It allows efficient recovery of assets located in multiple jurisdictions, reducing losses.
Q4: What reforms are proposed in the 2025 IBC Amendment Bill?
A: Enterprise-level valuation, global bidding, SOPs, accountability measures, and post-resolution support.
Q5: What is the role of Resolution Professionals (RPs)?
A: RPs manage the insolvency process, oversee creditors’ interests, and ensure fair asset disposal.
11. Conclusion
The IBC has been a transformative tool in India’s insolvency landscape, enhancing creditor confidence and promoting investment. However, persistent issues such as haircuts, asset valuation challenges, judicial delays, and limited competition highlight the need for reforms.
The IBC Amendment Bill, 2025, combined with global best practices, promises to strengthen the framework, ensuring higher recovery rates, improved transparency, and international alignment. By adopting enterprise-level valuations, encouraging global bidding, and establishing cross-border insolvency mechanisms, India can unlock the full potential of its insolvency law.
12. References
- Indian Express – IBC Amendment Bill 2025 Key Takeaways
- Sansad TV / ANI – Parliamentary Standing Committee Reports, 2025
- Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) – Annual Reports
- World Bank – Doing Business Reports on Insolvency
13.Visual to clearify -
Open this link 🔗 for visuals 👇
https://bizinsighthubiq.blogspot.com/2025/12/ibc-resolution-dashboard-20162025-body.html
- Bar chart of recovery vs claims
- Infographic explaining haircuts and valuation
- Flowchart of IBC resolution process
No comments:
Post a Comment